Should ICE Use Medicaid Data? Why Trump’s Plan Makes Sense

Should ICE Use Medicaid Data? Why Trump’s Plan Makes Sense

August 14, 2025

A federal judge in California has issued a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using Medicaid data for immigration enforcement. While the ruling is a setback, it’s far from the final word and it underscores the urgent need to defend the Trump Administration’s efforts to restore integrity to federal benefit programs.

In June, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began sharing Medicaid data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), allowing federal agents to identify individuals unlawfully residing in the United States. This move was followed by a formal data-sharing agreement in July. The goal? Ensure that taxpayer-funded benefits are reserved for those who are legally entitled to receive them.

Washington State and 19 other Democrat-led states sued, claiming the data transfer violated privacy laws and would discourage immigrants from seeking medical care. But the facts tell a different story

Federal law clearly permits agencies to share data for enforcement purposes. Statutes like 5 U.S.C. § 522a(b)(7) and 42 U.S.C. § 1306(a)(1) authorize inter-agency cooperation to uphold the law. The Trump Administration’s legal team rightly argued that:

  • DHS has a legitimate interest in identifying individuals who are unlawfully present.
  • Sharing Medicaid data helps prevent fraud and abuse of federal programs.
  • The public has a right to expect that benefits are not being misused.

The court acknowledged that such data sharing is not categorically unlawful and even cited multiple statutes that support it. The injunction was issued not because the policy itself was illegal, but because the agencies allegedly failed to follow procedural steps under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). That’s a fixable issue.

Medicaid is a lifeline for millions of Americans and it’s also a massive federal expenditure. When states enroll individuals who are not legally eligible, taxpayers foot the bill. The Trump Administration’s policy is about accountability, not cruelty.

FACT: emergency Medicaid is still available to all who need it, regardless of immigration status. But that doesn’t mean the federal government should turn a blind eye to systemic abuse or shield unlawful residents from enforcement.

This lawsuit is part of a broader resistance by sanctuary states to any form of immigration enforcement. By framing data-sharing as a privacy violation, they ignore the real issue: whether federal benefits are being distributed lawfully.

The Trump Administration is taking necessary steps to restore order, enforce immigration laws, and protect public resources. The court’s ruling is temporary and the agencies now have an opportunity to complete the required review process and reimplement the policy.

What’s Next

Supporters of immigration enforcement should stay engaged. The legal fight isn’t over, and the principles at stake — sovereignty, accountability, and lawful governance — are worth defending.

Let’s stand with the Trump Administration as it works to ensure that federal programs serve the American people, not undermine the rule of law.


Join the Movement. Protect What Matters.

Conservative Ladies of America is empowering citizens to take a stand, speak boldly, and defend the values that make this country strong. From policy advocacy to grassroots mobilization, we’re showing up where it counts and we need your support.

Donate today to help us educate, activate, and amplify conservative voices nationwide.

Every dollar strengthens our mission. Let’s stand together.