On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that quietly delivered a major victory for pro-life advocates and for taxpayers who are tired of seeing their dollars fund abortion providers under the guise of Medicaid reimbursements.
In Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, the Court ruled that Medicaid recipients do not have a private right to sue state officials under federal law to force continued funding of providers like Planned Parenthood. The ruling came down 6–3, with the Court’s conservative majority affirming that Medicaid is a contract between the federal government and the states—not a blank check for activists to enforce their political preferences in court.
At the heart of this case was a clause in Medicaid law often referred to as the “any qualified provider” rule. Abortion providers and their allies have used this provision to argue that states are obligated to keep them in the Medicaid system if they meet certain qualifications—regardless of whether the state has concerns about how those providers operate or what services they offer.
South Carolina tried to remove Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program, citing its involvement in abortion services. Predictably, a lawsuit followed—brought not by Planned Parenthood directly, but by a patient who claimed she had the right under federal law to choose her provider.
The Supreme Court said no. That clause in Medicaid law does not create an individual right enforceable through lawsuits. This is a huge shift.
This ruling restores a measure of state authority that has been chipped away by activist litigation. It confirms that states have the right to determine which providers they include in their Medicaid programs, and that those decisions cannot be overridden by private individuals suing under vague statutory language.
It also marks a significant blow to the abortion industry’s legal strategy. For years, Planned Parenthood has used the courts to cling to government funding streams—even when states attempted to cut them off. That strategy just lost a major tool.
Although the federal Hyde Amendment restricts direct funding of abortion procedures, groups like Planned Parenthood have still received hundreds of millions in government reimbursements for other services—dollars that effectively subsidize their abortion operations. This ruling helps put a stop to that.
The media won’t cover this decision with the same fanfare they give to other landmark rulings (because “abortion isn’t a winning issue” and “abortion is not the hill to die on”), but the implications are far-reaching. This case sets a precedent that empowers states to act in accordance with the values of their voters—especially on controversial issues like abortion.
States now have a stronger legal footing to defund abortion providers through Medicaid without fear of being dragged into federal court. We hope to see many red state immediately pull their funding of Planned Parenthood.
For the pro-life movement and for those advocating responsible, life-affirming healthcare policy, this is a win worth celebrating.
If you haven’t watched our recent interview with Dr. Bill Lile, aka “Prolife Doc”, a board-certified OB/GYN and bold pro-life voice, now is the time. We discuss ectopic pregnancies, miscarriage care, and how the abortion lobby is weaponizing misinformation to push their agenda. YouTube doesn’t want you to see this—but you should.
Support Our Work
If you value the work we’re doing at Conservative Ladies of America to educate, empower, and equip citizens to stand up for life and liberty, we invite you to support us. Your donations help us create content like this, speak out boldly, and hold the line on the issues that matter most.
Conservative Ladies of America is a 501(c)(4) organization.
That means your donation helps fuel direct advocacy and education efforts—but it is not tax-deductible.
Every contribution makes a difference.